not UFology. Newsflash Mr. Carion, you ARE part of the "circus," -- we all are. How an ex-director of MUFON, who is currently involved in a new organization exploring an aspect of UFOs, say with a straight face he is not part of the "circus" is a deliciously ironic, er, circus like, stance to take."I'll add that the word UFO is in the name of the group! UFO is part of the acronym, yet, Carion insists, this new enterprise (heh, talk about twilight language) contains the word UFO in its very title. The title is also fun, in its ironic pot/kettle black way, for its word "truth." What a display of arrogance and self important stuff shirted puffery!Carion never did like saucer heads. He reiterates his distaste for the distasteful and bothersome UFO witnesses and UFO explorers of various kinds:"CUT will work outside of the three ring circus that is Ufology and will not accept the contributions of anonymous individuals or alleged whistleblowers nor will it examine alleged leaked documents."Yes, why bother with interviewing witnesses to see if they are credible or do the work involved to determine authenticity of documents? This is the problem with would be UFO Police; they set up their own little paradigm, decide to reject a good portion of what's out there, and all the time, they're congratulating each other on finally getting to the "truth." When you combine a systems like that with a dismissive attitude that reeks of classism and an obvious distaste for 90% of the thing you're studying, you cannot possibly get to any "truth." THE BIG LIERecently, the cyclic meme that "UFOlogy is dead" has been making the rounds, and I wonder: is this thing we loosely call UFOlogy really dead? Or is it just something people say out of frustration? I think the latter. UFOlogy is constantly shifting, and in fact, some big shakeups have been happening recently (David Jacobs, Cherry, and, um, Carion... ) but that doesn't make it dead. Do some think UFOlogy is "dead" because of the oft bemoaned statement that, "after such and such many years, we don't have any answers?"Carion remarks:"Ufology has nothing to show for more than 60 years of amateur investigation and research. By not establishing professional evidentiary standards, Ufology will neither join the halls of academic "ologies" nor will it discover the truth of what lies behind the subject of UFOs."The us of the qualifier "amateur" is unfair. It's snide." We're all amateurs. Does he mean amateur in the popular sense: meaning, less than? Or in the true sense, meaning not paid for one's work? Amateur has come to mean the former, more often than not, but being "amateur" does not always mean inferior. You cannot take away the study of UFOs from "the people" no matter how much you want to. And if you do, "why" do you want to? What's the intent?We don't have the Big Final Answer That Fits All to the UFO phenomenon. Carion's mistake, as with many others: thinking there is one. I don't know what halls of "ologies" he means, probably the institutions of science, academia, and ironically, the very governmental agencies he plans on getting all this information from, but the reality is: CUT, too, is just another UFO group in the eyes of those "ologies."But back to the meme that "after sixty years we haven't found the answer" -- I wonder if that's true. No, we don't have full disclosure, or the Beyond a Doubt UFO From Outer Space craft or an alien body. Well, not one revealed to the world on CNN anyway.The UFO phenomenon has layers upon shadowy layers upon deeper darker layers. It's a given UFOs and aliens are "real" and here, We've moved way beyond that. We know they "are"; we don't' know "what" they are.Parsing the UFO experience down to a small segment -- U.S. government agencies intentionally creating false UFO scenarios to distract -- is not a new idea, nor a surprise. And finding further proof that was the case at times won't "definitively" provide an answer to what UFOs are.
0 comments:
Post a Comment