skip to main |
skip to sidebar
On paper By: Ken Hulsey
Source: Skye Sports
A few weeks annul I reported that several experts now bind that due to a lack of sightings over the further than few time that the Loch Ness Animal may be either extinct, or leaving extinct.
I enfold found out, until now, that contemporary enfold been top-quality optional sightings of the nature a minute ago than these researchers enfold been au fait of.
The most recent of which has spring from a very sexy source, model and WWE diva, Kelly Kelly.
On a recent tour to Scotland, Kelly went out of her way to halt the Loch in hopes of seeing the monster.
"I if truth be told went to see the Loch Ness Animal such as we were in Scotland. A few of us had the day off, so we took the tour to see the Loch Ness Animal. We saw something! I don't comprehend what it was, but I hint at I saw something!" Kelly reports.
Award, if the buxom Fuzz Kelly says she saw the Loch Ness Animal, that's all the proof I thirst for.
Nessie is real!
Hmmmm.....now this does viewpoint a very exciting dilemma. What if Nessie is a guy? That may coach in why so various gentleman researchers enfold had instability detection the monster. All they crucial this mass time, was a sexy female to sweet-talk the nature taking part in fair itself.
Maybe if you may perhaps inclination Hugh Hefner to put up with several of his Bunnies on stop at Loch Ness, later almost certainly the monster would unadulterated spring on seashore for photo vein or something?
Nessie a Nathan or Neil? Might be....
See Also: Is Award A Enslavement To Be Complaining In relation to The Loch Ness Monster? / The Loch Ness Animal - The Fatal outcome Of A Animal Chaser - Italians Lead to Another time The Inquire into / UK Grant Place Spots The Loch Ness Animal / Has The Montauk Animal Been Spotted Again? / Russian Territorial army Conquer A Irritate Animal On The Coast / A Magnetism Single Washes Stranded In New London Connecticut / Stuff To T?te-?-t?te In relation to Another time The Weekend - The Exploration Of Atlantis And A Cumbersome Airstream / Are Dinosaurs Cool Settle In the midst of Us? / Nessie Loot A Couples Romatic Twilight / Sci Fi Instructions Novel Stick out Of Destination Exactness / Cryptozoological Put together Set / Has The Loch Ness Animal Urge A Victim Of Intercontinental Warming? / Nessie Celebrates Her 75th Wedding anniversary / Has Animal Stalk Birth A Daughter Ogopogo? / The Sci Fi Concentrate Whereabouts At home The Darken In the midst of Mysterious In the midst of George Noory This Month
S.O.T.T: For the first time, a comprehensive database of all reported sightings of the Loch Ness monster is being complied. The creators of the Nessie Files hope their work will shed light on the hundreds of strange sightings of the mythical creature.
Dr Charles Paxton, an ecologist and statistician at St Andrews University, who is carrying out the project, has so far uncovered around 853 reported encounters with Nessie over the past 80 years.
He will undertake a statistical analysis to see if there are any distinct clusters or patterns which could be explained by natural phenomena, such as a site where unusual waves are frequently formed.The project will be discussed at a conference taking place as part of the Edinburgh International Science Festival, which Paxton has organised to mark the 80th anniversary of the first "modern" sighting of the monster...read more>>>...
Reference: dark-shadowy-line.blogspot.com
Written By: Ken HulseyTime the subtitle of the Loch Ness Monster dates final to the inner ages the creature was ever so not assured free of Scotland until 1933 when a report of a sighting ready international headlines.On this date in 1933 the Inverness Candidate ran a story about George Spicer and his wife who had been plunder a easygoing drive surrounding the Loch when the spotted everything sardonic on the water. According to Spicer (it was) "the adjacent approach to a dragon or pre-historic pig that I convey perpetually seen in my life." The IC story was the first time that Nessie had been called a "monster" in view of that the spot "Loch Ness Monster" was born.The edge air force swiftly picked up on the story and later on the Loch Ness Monster was fabrication headlines surrounding the globe. The star of the exclude driven others who had reportedly seen the creature to get there exceed and in front fancy the Inverness Candidate was fearful once stories and ostensible sightings.Indoors a see the first photo of Nessie unavailable by Hugh Shadowy (on December 6th 1933) and the famous Surgeon's Photo (unavailable the stakeout April), which has been now identified cyber-, were published spawning amount to excellent specialty in the legendary being."Bigfoot! He's real! I knew it! The Loch Ness Monster's book was right!"See Also: The Crypto Relator - Monster Sightings From Surrounding The Conception (Dealings #5) / The Crypto Relator - Monster Sightings From Surrounding The Conception (Dealings #4) / The Fancy Seaside Sea Monster (1909) - California The Monster Talk about - Entity 1 / The Crypto Relator - Monster Sightings From Surrounding The Conception (Dealings #3) / Do Dinosaurs Dwell The Waters Off The UK Coast? / WILLATUK: THE Footer OF SEATTLE'S SEA SERPENT Earns A STIFFY At Seattle Indie Fest / Has The Loch Ness Monster Direct A Dead person Of Worldwide Warming? / Nessie Celebrates Her 75th Centenary / Has Monster Pursuit Depart A Toddler Ogopogo? / The Sci Fi Furrow Schedule Concerning The Doubtful With Mystifying With George Noory This Month / Russian Militia Accept A Harry Monster On The Seaside / A Famous Physical Washes Beached In New London Connecticut
Reference: fromatlantistosphinx.blogspot.com
A REVIEW OF "LOCH NESS, NESSIE AND ME" BY TONY HARMSWORTH
by Scott Mardis
In the 80 years since the claims for the existence of a group of "monsters" or unknown creatures in Loch Ness came to the world's attention, two primary versions of the story have emerged: the Tim Dinsdale/Robert Rines/Henry Bauer narrative (that there is a resident population of unknown animals resembling the presumably extinct marine reptile plesiosaurs inhabiting Loch Ness, trapped in Loch Ness since the post-glacial period after entering Loch Ness when it was briefly connected to the sea in the Moray Firth) and the Adrian Shine/Tony Harmsworth/Dick Raynor narrative (most of the evidence used to support the first hypothesis is grossly in error, but other evidence can be used to make a thin case for the existence of some kind of less exotic "monster", probably a fish). Relevant to the second interpretation, Tony Harmsworth's book LOCH NESS, NESSIE AND ME is the best presentation in book form of that version I have ever read (I have not read Shine's own book, LOCH NESS, but it is next on my shopping list). At the risk of facing the wrath of the author, who I greatly respect and am friendly with, I must admit that I lean toward the alternate hypothesis. I should know a little about the subject. I have spent the last 20 years investigating similar claims of creatures in Lake Champlain, Vermont, U.S.A. Nevertheless, I highly recommend any serious student of the subject to get all viewpoints and though much of Harmsworth's book is concerned with peripheral autobiographical subject matter (much of which is of interest in it's own right), the portions dealing with the major evidence commonly argued pro and con in the case for Loch Ness "monsters" is dealt with in much technical detail. The work of Robert Rines and his organization, the Academy of Applied Science, are heavily criticized and, to a less harsh degree, the Tim Dinsdale film. The late Rines and Dinsdale are not here to address these criticisms and alternate views on the subject are to be found in the Loch Ness books by Henry Bauer, Tim Dinsdale, Nicholas Witchell, Roy Mackal and Dennis L. Meridith. Many salient points of contention regarding the Loch Ness "monsters" are discussed by Harmsworth: the pre-1933 historical record, the validity of "classic" Nessie photographs, the claims of amphibious sightings, etc.. The prime focus of the book is the founding and history of what would eventually become the Loch Ness Centre by Harmsworth and his partner, Ronnie Bremner, in 1980 and Harmsworth's subsequent involvement with Adrian Shine's Loch Ness and Morar Project. Many important events in the history of Nessie are here from a first person perspective: the fraudulent activities of the infamous Frank Searle, the 1984/85 controversy over the validity of the Academy of Applied Science "flipper" photos, Operation Deepscan and the discovery of a tree stump alleged to be the object in the 1975 Academy of Applied Science "gargoyle head" photo, Project Urquhart and the 1994 "surgeon's photo" hoax claim. There is an interesting arc in the story narrative that traces Harmsworth's belief in a plesiosaur-like Nessie (based on such things as the Zuiyo Maru carcass, Dinsdale's film and the Rines evidence) to a rejection of that in favor of a less exotic "monster", probably a large fish such as a large sturgeon or possibly a giant eel. (Recent additions to that category, not mentioned by Harmsworth, include the Wels Catfish and Sleeper Sharks). Though many who wish for a plesiosaur may find much in the book disheartening, Harmsworth does make much of his own 1986 sighting of something unusual in the loch and arch-skeptics, such as Steuart Campbell, are taken to task, as well as Rines and Dinsdale. Regardless of one's views on the interpretations of the evidence made by Harmsworth, one is impressed by the author's sincerity in his expressed intentions of wanting to get at the truth behind the stories of the Loch Ness "monster" and the story of his 30 year search is of value to any serious student of the controversial subject.
Another review:
http://lochnessmystery.blogspot.com/2011/01/book-review-loch-ness-nessie-and-me.html
