By Heywood Mogroot

"Inertialess" sounds like "not real": lights, optical illusions, tricks of the mind, dreams, tales."

Or tech a bit more advanced than us. Depends on whether your belief system allows high-tech ET to exist, be able to find us, and be able to send craft here. I have no problem with any of these propositions.

If the craft don't do anything weird, the skeptics say they (with some justification) that the UFO were unknown terrestrial. If the UFO do exceed conventional capabilities, the skeptics would say they are "tricks of the mind, dreams, and tales".

Nice defense mechanism you've got there. fwiw, I agree that as long as it's just weird lights in the sky the whole UFO thing isn't worth the investment of much time or effort.

But the proof, should one be interested, is in the evidence, such as it is. Such cases as RB-47 are interesting advances in the science of UFOlogy. There's no cut&dried answer yet, but only mental midgets require that degree of evidential clarity before taking the issue seriously.

In the Illinois case, Officer Barton said he saw the object scoot (from a slow cruise) ~8mi across the sky rather quickly. He could be lying, or was drunk, or whatever. But the officer in the next town says he saw a similar object to what Barton saw.

Source: space-wanderers.blogspot.com