The inform inwards, of late, is about the goad of images and engagements described by group who've had an encounter not later than UFOs that goes onwards a sea sighting of a light in the sky or a round aircraft flying overhead.
Jose Caravaca has provided, inwards and at his blog (Th"e Caravaca Collection"), a spin out of cases wherever a have fun or group report noble relations not later than UFOs and entities from persons UFOs.
Se~nor Caravaca points out that the cases he presents don't move relations surrounded by humans and distant natural world or Disneyland font, or any other reassuring of imagery but in basic terms that which is completely UFO leaning.
That is an soaring examination of his embryonic Lampoon Picture.
But I'm departure to find the middle ground, again, not later than the "prima causa" that Se~nor Caravaca and Graze Redfern say or fit into is truthful for UFO accomplishments.
That "prima causa", as Jose and Graze see it, is a psychical entice that has been interacting not later than the human race in the role of the start of concerned life (and almost certainly jet in advance that).
Now I wail that "prima causa" God or the Universal Sentience: the total, colossal mind.
That mind puzzle in the sticks and haughty from human beings, unless humans try to flagrant contact not later than it.
(This is the gist, as I recover words, of Herman Melville's epiphanic work, "Moby Dick", which you can obtain an exegesis of by Googling Lewis Mumford, among others.)
God or the Universal Thought intersected not later than the likes of Moses, Socrates, Joan of Arc, and imposing others over the eons of human existence.
But why would my Universal Thought use UFO imagery to flagrant contact not later than precise doomed humans play secret message but dulcet in dull activities?
Se~nor Caravaca's "other" and Graze Redfern's psychical mischievous spirit give the impression that enhanced amend to the UFO accomplishments they brag proffered.
My rampant and in shape engrossed "goddess" seems a bit too pretentious to view break up in the UFO accomplishments that brag been reported over the being, jet that of Ezekiel in the "Hebrew Bible".
But in the hierarchal categories of the Gnostics and other hidden theologies grant are pubescent divinities that one possibly will introduce to the unpleasant UFO encounters that brag occurred over the being.
So I can visage (and do) the judgment that everything has interacted not later than precise humans, in key ages as witches or distinct chimerae, and in (quite) hot epoch as elements not later than the accoutrements of extraterrestrial technology.
But is it possible, and I fit into it is, that, almost certainly, no exterior "mischievous spirit" is phobia in UFO activity at all, that psychological or neural scheming may be an innate break up of or the "prima causa" of UFO be knowledgeable about(s).
I fit into Bruce Duensing agrees not later than me.
Don Ledger, a outdoor and not permitted ufologist, for the most part "in situ" at UFO UpDates has been pooh-poohing the psychological etiology for UFOs.
Why do I eschew Don Ledger?
Here's Mr. Ledger's recent shower, at UFO Updates, wary Joe McGonagle, a British (cautious) ufologist not later than very much esteem among UFO cognoscenti about a come into being that Joe brought to the awareness of Fleeting "listers" (as Fleeting members following to be community):
From: Don Ledger
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 13:45:42 -0400
Subject: Re: Articulate In Psychology Article Study
>From: Joe McGonagle
>Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:12:14 +0000
>Subject: Re: Articulate In Psychology Article Study
...
Any damn youngster can obtain the nut cases out grant and twist them in
and contamination the test data slope.
And cut the poor-mouthing Joe; "your" [sic] not fooling someone. If I always see suchlike positive/upbeat pull in out of your postings, it strength be a day of spectacle.
Don Ledger
Note the evil use of "your" for "you're."
Mr. Ledger strikes me as a pinhead, so for instance he eschews the psychological explanation for UFOs, I fire his execution.
It is concrete, to me, that neural parameters brag very much to do not later than UFO sightings and extremely UFO encounters.
One of the reasons that I assert the psychological is that nowhere in the sightings imminent by Se~nor Caravaca is grant translucent bell. Yes, precise witnesses uttered nervousness or care but none had indicated bell, following that which precise victims of nightmares, night-terrors brag reported.
The UFO encounters noted by Caravaca and Redfern are oneiric (dream-like) or firm to a movie or project show.
Now this is for the "hot" era accomplishments.
The horrors that humans eligible in the Crookedness and Halfway ages were sparked by the imagery that the Priestly promulgated, and such enterprises as The Post-mortem exacerbated.
The "hot" era allows for a SciFi hunch, supported by the prolific mischievous spirit of SciFi imagery in the magazines, movies, TV shows, et cetera that we've inserted inwards in the in the past few weeks or so.
It doesn't view an unprejudiced mischievous spirit to counterfeit UFO accomplishments. That indicates a mischievous spirit that has secret message best quality to do but imitate games not later than a few, affront human beings, in abandoned spaces who brag no unfavorable community mischievous spirit, and in basic terms are community by the deep-digging research of such group as Jose Caravaca (and his Spanish colleagues) or the problem-solving work of Graze Redfern.
So, wherever are we in this discussion?
We (my group and precise amalgamated band inwards) brag got to obtain the neural works that possibly will goad he UFO accomplishments that occurred in the recent in the past, but are not spoils cope with now. (And why is that?)
Or Jose Caravaca and Graze Redfern (and jet Jacques Vallee) brag got to pull in up not later than the saleable "mischievous spirit" they say is the think up of the UFO accomplishments or reports that counterfeit an awe in precise of us.
0 comments:
Post a Comment